- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Intenso (brand) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Electronics company doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP- lacks coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete- insufficient coverage indicates lack of notability and hence not encyclopaedic in nature. Such-change47 (talk) 10:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP. DMySon (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable company that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP as they lack significant coverage in RS, independent of them. Also couldn't find RS in German Wikipedia page of the company. Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP- there isn't any significant coverage, no factual data. Juggyevil (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Topic references fail NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 22:17, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.