- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pyaar ak 47 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film; no significant coverage in reliable sources. ╟─TreasuryTag►CANUKUS─╢ 09:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Treasury Tag's rationale, even the studio behind it seems to barely exist except in a facebook page. Egg Centric 08:46, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, is it speedyable? It seems to me like it may be recreation of already deleted content given the [1] [2] [3]s that were presumnably ref's before...? Egg Centric 08:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable film with no independent coverage.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.